Welcome to suburbia

I've finally plucked up the courage to set-up an online blog. I'm going to endeavour to blog as often as possible to share my thoughts, to share some articles and news i find interesting, and also use it for my private reflections (you guys won't get to see that!). Also i hope people will read and comment on some of my posts.

The spur for deciding to set-up a blog has been my studies through the Open University. They encourage learning and reflection, and collaborating with others.
Showing posts with label Suburbia wants to rant about politics and the world. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Suburbia wants to rant about politics and the world. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 April 2012

A Short history of avoidance


Living on the coast and having the delights of a metropolitan setting such as Brighton, has left me a little spoiled and occasionally closed minded. I guess I have a degree of understanding for those people from Wales that declare it “Gods own country” without ever having really been anywhere else. BTW people from Kerala say the same, but they are never in Kerala when they say it!
As a young ‘un going through school there was always a nagging doubt, an unconscious pull, a distant realisation that one day I would have to live and work in London. That big, smelly, overcrowded, overpriced, place where everyone walks very quickly, doesn’t have the time, looks bloody miserable to be frank! I had a fear of living life like one of those fuzzy filler shots they would use on the 6 o clock news (does that still exist?) of commuters trudging across Tower Bridge looking like an army of the damned forced into fighting in support of the capitalist dream. Being jostled by other foot soldiers, but not even reacting to the stray elbows of the bowler hated men, so accustomed had these warriors become to suffering such contact.

Ever since then my I’ve grown up with a strong avoidance complex. That is, wanting to avoid London at all costs. I mean I took a job in Birmingham, probably as a warm up act for the inevitable, for two years. With the prospect of having to further my career in the big smoke, I upped sticks and with my all worldly possessions (which at this stage amounted to a Nissan micra full of DVDs and clothes) and moved 3,500 miles away from London to Dubai. Sadly after 3 year years getting sweaty in the desert, hearing every place in the UK referred to as “London” regardless of where it might be situated, I succumbed to the inevitable. Looking for a job back in the UK required acknowledging that there is only one commercial centre, and the gravitational pull proved too strong.

The one thing that hits you when you finally lose all your principles…. Sorry I mean... move to London, is it vastness… no wrong again, apologies, it is how bloody expensive it is. I know this is not news, but truth be told looking for an affordable flat (even with 2 other roommates) means searching some pretty shady areas, and having to put up with low water pressure, lack of maintenance, and a crime rate that wouldn’t look out of place on “Midsommer murders”. Having found the place of your dreams/nightmares you then have to tackle a commute; that takes some figuring out. After about 6 months, I figured out that to get the optimal amount of space on the tube I had to get up at stupid o clock for my inbound journey, and stay until “are you really still here, don’t you have anywhere else to go” territory on the outbound journey.
Next there is the culture of the City. I’m not talking about the greater metropolitan area of London, but where all the slickers live. Hard drinking, hard smoking, hard working, hard womanising, you name it, although where anyone gets the time for this is beyond me. For more qualified opinions on this visit Joris Luyendijk’s comment blog on the Guardian. Face time, being seen to be in the office, busy, but not too busy, socialable but not too… well you get the picture. It is essentially an elaborate mechanism of control. As you realise from the contradictions in the last sentences, there is no rule book or guide to follow, and so the rules are applied arbitrarily to keep you on your toes. You begin to ask yourself; “what happened to just working to get the job done, rather than being in the right place at the right time”.

9 months of 5 days a week city working had done me in. So I escaped to a peripatetic role; roaming the rolling hillsides of Great Britain, taking in the wonderment of a fully functioning railway system, marvelling at the vibrancy of the village market place, or alternatively getting smashed in Nottingham, Enjoying the exquisite cuisine of the only establishment open on a Monday in Southend, or being caught in a snow drift in Edinburgh. Not as glamorous as first imagined, but infinitely better than the stupefying monotony of commuter life in London.

My last role tipped me over the edge. I wasn’t specifically the working conditions (although they didn’t help), it was the return to ye olde Londinium, and all that I have described being applied at a 7 on the Richter scale. Getting up at 5:30 each day, leaving for the train at 6:20 (before @weasypeasy was even awake), eyes down on the train for fear of catching the rest of the passengers silently weeping at the thought of another day, arriving into Liverpool Street station, dodging the free paper jockey’s (Stylist, Standard, City AM, Metro, Sport, and the other one that had something to do with culture), walking in all weathers the 30 minutes to Bankside (as there were no easily accessible tube routes) arriving at bankside to order the largest coffee they could possible provide me with, then being the good foot soldier and applying the principles of face time and looking productive, only taking a 30 minute lunch for fear of taking liberties (how dare you take your mandated lunch hour!), trying not to doze off in the afternoon, slipping out to grab a double espresso to make the afternoon fly by, leave around 6 ish (depending on what you think you could get away with), curse yourself for having sat around working two hours unpaid overtime, walk 30 minutes back to the station, wait 20 minutes for train, due to Olympic improvements endure a journey of 50 minutes that should take 30 minutes, get home collapse eat and go to bed. Repeat each weekday.
I’m giving London a bit of a bad review here. I wouldn’t have stayed in London or its general vicinity if it didn’t have its charms. Saturday’s and Sunday’s in Queens Park could be very hospitable. Plenty of bistro’s and coffee shops to sit in reading the papers, the occasional park to wander aimlessly in, BBQ’s in the summer, access to the theatres and sporting events. And my favourite part was exploring a farmers market for some Sunday lunch ingredients. But it didn’t last, of my own free will, and to follow the love of my life, I moved to Harlow.

I could do an entire blog post on this sorry little island of poverty in an affluent part of Essex. The following graphic merits at least a double page spread in the Times:

That little red dot is Harlow, how is it even possible? “Ranked 132 in England for the biggest risk of poverty and 173 for child poverty out of 326 local authorities”, so says the Grauniad. An anomaly perhaps, but having lived there for two years I will recant one tale that will justify my disgust. In the short time I had before moving to Luxembourg, I was on the phone to my parents, when my mother said “what was that sound, like a barking noise, are there dogs nearby?” it was my duty to inform her that it was 3 of the local inhabitants who had been on the sauce all day barking like dogs at one another. One of many low points during my time there, I know I said only one story, but another one has sprung to mind. I very rarely ventured into the Harvey Centre or general area, as like Superman and kryptonite it sapped my will to live on and diminished my faith in humanity. One afternoon I ventured into town, to be confronted by a Grandmother and 6 children, reminiscent of the pied piper she held an open can of stella in one hand (no need for a pipe) and beckoned the children to “get a F%$king move on, you can play xbox when we get home”. A dystopian vision if ever there was one.

 So time ran out on my patience, time was running out on being a good and healthy person and I collected my possessions and those of @weasypeasy (significantly more than a Micra’s worth, especially with all the shoes) to flee for the continent.

I hope you’ll forgive me for not liking the big smoke or wanting to return there soon?

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

The Tea Party Republican Debate

Ok for starters this isn’t my constituency, not even close. For all its faults I believe the federal government, or any government indeed, gets it right sometimes. Sadly Tea Party Republicans just do not agree.

Two things that devalued this event. 1) Wolf Blitzer; shouty, verbose, lacks facial expressions, doesn’t ad-lib or tell jokes well. 2) interaction via twitter. Typical question flashed up on screen (but not asked) “which is your favourite amendment to the bill of rights”, never good to encourage this.

Here is my candidate summary:
Rick Perry (the Chin)
Didn’t seem comfortable talking in full sentences. His ploy on jobs doesn’t work; simply because most of those are second jobs or low wage, also as Ron Paul pointed out 750k of them were government jobs. Got a shellacking about calling social security a Ponzi scheme, saying Fed Chair should be tried for treason and forcing girls in Texas to take a vaccination (oopps). The last of these caused him the most pain of the evening, as he apologised for the process but not the decision.

Mitt Romney (The Mormon)
Was on the offensive from the start, realising his front runner status has gone, he attacked Perry from all angles. Sadly, despite landing several punches it wasn’t his crowd either, and so he didn’t get much appreciation from an audience that only wanted Obama bashing.

Michelle Bachmann (Sound bite queen)
Delivered several big sound bites and red meat for the crowd. Wanted to rise above the other candidates, by not engaging with them, but instead focusing her ire on Obama. Declined attacks on Perry and Romney, increasing my beliefs around her withdrawing soon.

Jon Huntsman (Worked for the bad guy)
On the fringes in terms of the stage and also the Republican field. Pivoted to his Wall Street Journal approved jobs plan, once too often.

Ron Paul (Wants to get rid of the government completely)
Like the dotty old uncle at xmas, he has some kooky ideas, but you invite him anyways as he would have no-where else to go.
However he got an interesting round of applause for getting America out of foreign wars; interesting because it was 9/12 and because the armed forces command respect in Americana

Rick Santorum (Courage)
Courage, I had courage, I did a courageous thing, I fought the law and the law won. Bit tough to chew when you consider he has been part of the Washington establishment that he so easily derides.  

Herman Cain (Pizza mogul)
What an earth is this man still doing here? CEO of Godfathers Pizza, talked about letting business fix problems- question is what would he do as POTUS?

Newt Gingrich (stupid name, stupid face)
Fell off my chair because he said something insightful. Talked about saving $500m from government waste, and $150m from fraud in medicare. Although tied himself in knots when talking about taxes, a one point suggesting more tax was needed.

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

#endwarondrugs

I mention in my AV or Not to AV post about the debating club i was part of as an impressionable youth. The topics were very mainstream; Political change, Monarchic questions, fox hunting, ban on boxing, death penalty etc.

The one which always gets an airing is Drugs. A popular, hot topic among young people of any era. At the time i was anti-drugs, and largely still am. However i am a "personal choice" sort of anti-drugs person; in that i don't indulge, but if it floats yer boat....

http://tiny.cc/lzbjm

this excellent argument adds more statistics and detail to the very artful Economist billboards (one pro and one con, typically at train/tube stations). I have to admit that if we have a drug that alleviates suffering, that brings relief to those in pain we should do everything in our power to put it to use.

Also the sheer economics of it is staggering. The failed polices of countless decades, have heaped more ill advised investment on ill advised investment. Not sure blanket legalisation is the answer, but there is a middle ground that is suffocated by conservative interests and "family values".

Lets have a real debate about drugs policy, education and regulation

Friday, 29 April 2011

Masdar City – a glimpse of the future in the desert

Took me a while to shake off my post MBA lethargy, but i got there in the end. I don't want to have Twitter dominate my blog feed etc, they should be in balance like ying and yang

This is a great article about Masdar city, a mere glimmer in the eye when i departed the UAE. It honestly didn't get a lot of media attention, i believe, mainly because it was a pretty hairbrained scheme! Containing technology not yet conceived and more ambitious than your average green construction project.

Fact of the matter is that the UAE desalinates ALL of its water, this is incredibly resource intensive, and uses up energy (in the form of oil) that outweighs the benefits of clean water. No matter how much i despise nuclear power, i have to embrace the courage the UAE authorities have shown in backing Masdar, but also the tough decisions that need to be made to provide for the immediate power needs.

That's why i'm saddened but not surprised by the lowering of ambitions laid out in the article below. The point is; at least they're trying something.... Germany has no plan to achieve nuclear independence, 24% of UK power comes from French nuclear power plants, Jon Huntsman (prospective Republican nominee for president) has just declared his platform to make America energy independant. No specifics! Get Green People.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/apr/26/masdar-city-desert-future


Tuesday, 26 April 2011

To AV or not to AV

I remember, when studying my A-Level in Politics, covering alternative voting systems. However what springs to mind is that AV (or single transferable vote, as it was known) wasn't really taken seriously as an alternative system. You can argue both sides of the fence; AV is fair and reflects the voting preferences of the majority, and also that it is not fair as (yes its true, although unlikely) a candidate in 3rd or 4th position on first count could win after all votes have counted.

Its the first election in a while that i am really struggling to decide what to do. Not an issue last year in the general, not an issue in this year's local elections (mainly because i have a disappointing selection of three candidates from the main parties).

This referendum is a real head scratcher, why? because i'm in favour of every vote counting, i want the lack of choice provided by FPTP to be abolished, i hope a change in system will create a more collaborative political climate (although the current coalition is insistent on proving me wrong on this point!), but at the core of it all i am convinced that AV is a half measure, not really proportional, not really allowing for every vote to count, and in some constituencies will result in the three big parties getting a 1,2,3 and therefore hoarding all of the bloody votes!

Ah ha, i hear you say, but AV works in Australia. Well yeah it does, but it would have to wouldn't it? For compulsory voting to work you need some sort of incentive to the masses, and being able to be indecisive (the modern political equivalent of not bothering to turn up in the first place) and choose your 3 favourites i some incentive!

What do i really want? that is easy, party list is what i want. This is the method they use in European elections, and is where rather than choosing a constituency MP you choose a party to support (which is what most people do anyway), and in your region/area the representation is distributed based on true proportion of votes cast. Yes that does mean that the BNP gets in, but it also means the Greens get a seat at the table (outside of the fabulously liberal Brighton Pavilion), and will hopefully lead to the rise of some leftist parties outside of the current (limited) spectrum. It means when i vote i will get represented by an MP from the party of my choice in my region. Opponents of such a system say that it removes the accountability that a constituency MP has to their voters, in response i have one word- Expenses. Also they say that people won't know how or who to raise local concerns with. Frankly that is a bit of an old fashioned view to hold. Most people are using a variety of new technologies to make themselves heard and get the ear of power; take Mumsnet etc. Also i have never had cause to speak to my MP- he is too busy eating lunches paid for by professional lobbyists to worry about what i have to say.

Sadly party list is not on the table. So do i do as many are saying they will do which is vote Yes to push the door ajar on the issue of proportional voting, or do i vote No as on principle AV is the wrong system to push the door open with and may in effect stall the adoption of a better system.

Voting No has additional complications, mainly siding with a group of people that are willing to use scare tactics and down right lies to win votes. If i wasn't comfortable with AV, i am even less comfortable with this!

Decisions, decisions. only a week to go!

Monday, 18 April 2011

Royal wedding rant

Firstly for the record I'm no Royalist but I'm not a Republican either. One of things that has struck me in recent weeks is how in the age of austerity the royal family seem to be in intent on raising our spirits by spending an extortionate amount of tax payer money on a wedding between the heir to the thrown and a mere commoner, as the British press has often referred to Kate Middleton.
I remember when I was at school as part of the debating club once a year we were asked to debate the merits and the demerits of the royal family in Britain. No firm position was ever agreed upon, as in most debates, however one thing is for certain the overriding feeling was that we had to keep them for tourism purposes. And for once despite its detractors this point seems to be bearing out, mainly because of the sheer amount of coverage that the American press has invested in with regards to the wedding. I'm sure the feeling is similar in a traditionally Republican France and also most of the Commonwealth countries. The attitude clearly being; "you can have them during the rest of the year but when it comes to a wedding they are a global phenomenon"
Sent from my iPhone

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Who wants to have a go?

Great article in the Economist about possible challengers in the 2012 American Election.
Selected quotes below:
BY THE absurdly elongated standards of American politics, next year’s presidential election is not that far away. It is less than a year until the first primaries and caucuses. By this time four years ago eight Republicans and ten Democrats had already thrown their hats in the ring; so far this year no serious candidate has done so
only three sitting presidents have lost re-election bids since the second world war. All threeGerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and George Bush senior
As Haley Barbour, governor of Mississippi and a potential Republican candidate himself, said recently, Mr Obama “is one of the greatest politicians in the history of the United States”.
A few mooted contenders have already ruled themselves out of the race. John Thune, a photogenic senator from South Dakota, announced in late February that he would not run. Mike Pence, a congressman from Indiana, seems to have settled on a tilt for the state’s governorship instead. Chris Christie, the governor of New Jersey and an idol of deficit hawks, has repeatedly and vociferously denied having any presidential ambitions. So have Rick Perry, the long-serving governor of Texas, and Marco Rubio, a charismatic young senator from Florida who would be a big draw for the Hispanic vote, which the Republicans have foolishly alienated by their opposition to immigration reform. Many of these are thought to be biding their time until 2016, when Mr Obama, if re-elected, would have to step down, leaving no incumbent candidate.
Plus this pretty cool graphic on the runners and riders- I think Pizza mogul vs Obama has a nice ring to it
Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)

Sunday, 27 February 2011

Our 1932 moment?

Very worrying report on British nationalism. In times of economic crisis people look for someone to blame. But few people think about the consequences of a protest vote. Luckily the main parties are violent, ill-disciplined, and full of factions. Not even Griffin can't control his membership, and in positions of power (like the bnp in Europe) they rarely make an impact other than looking stupid raising trivial issues

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/feb/27/support-poll-support-far-right

Sent via the Guardian's iPhone application.

Get it Here


Sent from my iPhone

Monday, 21 February 2011

Libya on the brink as protests hit Tripoli

Guys,

i was sitting in the airport this morning waiting for my flight to Edinburgh, and i saw the latest developments in Libya.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/20/libya-defiant-protesters-feared-dead

Perhaps the most important part of this, but also the most under reported is the unrest in Oman and Kuwait. Kuwait is a barely functioning democracy, but in terms of Arab politics it is the model i'm sure countries like Egypt would've been looking to follow. The Crown Prince is the Prime Minister and the parliament is elected included women MPs- The sort of reform other rioting countries would embrace, however something is "rotten in the state of Denmark". The PM being a member of the Royal family can not be held to account in parliament, as excessive questioning is seen as disrespectful (some good articles on this @ Gulfnews and @ The National- both UAE papers i keep abreast of). So despite it ticking all the reform boxes the public wants more.

So with the UK and International media claiming this is a wave of protest, it is important to understand the context- there are different levels of autocratic leadership, including the monarchic structures in the Oil producing gulf states (technically constitutional monarchies).

So trouble in Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman and the Yemen. That leaves only the UAE, Saudi and Qatar as currently unaffected on the Arabian Peninsula. All bets are off, don't get me wrong i wouldn't mind seeing the end of some of the vile practices that occur under the house of saud, but Qatar and the UAE? a genuinely horrible thought that could send back the region 10 years, to instability and squabbling .

Thoughts?